Below is an article I read from MindTools,which was worth sharing
Shape Up Your Career Using Holland's Codes
You know when you are in a job you like. You also know when the task you’re doing just isn't right for you.
What lies behind our feelings of work satisfaction or dissatisfaction are our fundamental work interests: These are the things that we enjoy doing, whatever the industry or the job title. The trick to finding career satisfaction can be to identify those core interests and match your job to them.
For example, if you’re a science person, you may not be happy working in a job that needs quick decisions, or where you need to use your “gut” to guide you. Likewise, artistic people would be driven mad in a profession that has lots of rules and procedures, or which demands a lot of number crunching.
In a perfect world, we would all choose careers that suit our core interests. However this is not a perfect world: For all sorts of reasons, we can find ourselves in positions where what we’re doing just doesn’t suit our natural interests and abilities. This is where understanding how job and personality fit together can help you change the situation for the better.
Ability and personality are the two main things contribute towards job satisfaction. You’re likely to find that jobs that suit your ability and personality are much more rewarding than those that don’t. Here we look at your work interests – an important part of your work personality.
Understanding the Theory:Holland's Codes
In the 1970’s John Holland developed a popular theory of interest development based around these six personality types:
1. Realistic (R):
These are people who like well-ordered activities, or enjoy working with objects, tools, and machines.
Realistic people:
- see themselves as mechanically or athletically talented, but may not be good with people.
- value concrete and tangible things like – money, power, and status.
- avoid “social” activities, those that need interaction with other people.
Common traits:
- Hard-headed, inflexible, persistent, materialistic, practical, and genuine.
2. Investigative (I):
Investigative people like activities that involve creative investigation of the world or nature.
Investigative people:
- see themselves as highly intelligent, but often lack leadership skills.
- value scientific endeavors.
- avoid activities that seem mundane, commercial or “enterprising”.
Common traits:
- Analytical, curious, pessimistic, intellectual, precise, and reserved.
3. Artistic (A):
Artistic people like unstructured activities, and enjoy using materials to create art.
Artistic people:
- see themselves as talented artists.
- value aesthetics.
- avoid “conventional” occupations or situations.
Common traits:
- Idealistic, complicated , introspective, sensitive, impractical and nonconformist.
4. Social (S):
Social people enjoy informing, training, developing, curing and enlightening others.
Social people:
- perceive themselves as helpful, understanding and able to teach others.
- value social activities.
- avoid activities demanded by “realistic” occupations and situations.
Common traits:
- Generous, patient, emphatic, tactful, persuasive, and cooperative.
5. Enterprising (E):
These people enjoy reaching organizational goals or achieving economic gain.
Enterprising people:
- see themselves as aggressive, popular, great leaders and speakers, but may lack scientific ability.
- value political and economic achievement.
- avoid activities demanded by “investigative” occupations and situations.
Common traits:
- Extroverted, adventurous, optimistic, ambitious, sociable, and exhibitionistic.
6. Conventional (C):
Conventional people enjoy manipulating data, record keeping, filing, reproducing materials, and organizing written or numerical data.
Conventional people
- see themselves as having clerical and numerical ability
- value business and economic achievement
- avoid unstructured or “artistic” activities
Common traits:
- Efficient, practical, conscientious, inflexible, defensive, and methodical.
The Model
Holland then arranged these six personality types into a hexagon (see figure 1, below) organized according to people’s preference for working with different stimuli at work: people, data, things, and ideas. Holland’s theory is that people with different personality types prefer working with different work stimuli, and that the distance between work personalities indicates the degree of difference in interests between them. For example Artistic people are least like Conventional people and most like Social and Investigative people.
Holland’s conclusion was that for any personality type, the career most aligned with that type is most likely to be enjoyable and satisfying. For example, a Realistic person would be best suited for a Technical job and least suited for Social job. Jobs with Conventional or Operational characteristics would be the next best choices.
The way that this works in practice is that people people use a personality test to identify their three top personality types. This gives their Holland's code (for example, ESA). This is then matched against the Holland's codes of people typically found within particular careers.
How to Use Holland Codes Career Model:
There are two good ways of using this model - either in helping you choose a career that suits you, or in helping you shape your existing job so that you maximize your fulfillment. To find your ideal career according to this approach, just complete steps i and ii below. To shape your job, use all of the steps we outline.
Using Holland’s Codes is a straightforward process, which is made all the easier by some useful online interest evaluation sites.
Part One Identify your Work Personality
Step i: Read through the brief descriptions given above and find the one you most identify with. You may want to take an official Holland Code Assessment. There are many of these, costing different amounts – you can find them by typing “Holland Code Assessment” into Google.
Try one: Does the assessment say what you thought it would? If they aren’t, ask yourself why: Often we choose a personality type that reflects who we want to be, not who we really are. (If so, learn from this!)
| Tip 1: |
Step ii: To further explore your “true” work personality, ask yourself, “How would my spouse, family, and friends categorize me?” Show some of your friends and co-workers descriptions of the types and ask them to categorize you. Here again, explore any differences between your assessment of yourself and theirs.
Part Two: Analyze your job in terms of your interests
Step iii: Look at your main tasks and responsibilities. Are they aligned with your work personality?
Step iv: List those responsibilities that are aligned in one column and those that are not in another. Use this to decide whether your job is a good fit for your interests or not.
Step v: For each of the job roles where your interests are not well matched, work out at least one way of bringing the two sides together. For instance, if you are a “Conventional” person working in an administrative position, many of your roles will be in-line with your interests. However, if you were asked to organize the Christmas party, you might be very uncomfortable about deciding about decorations, entertainment, and so on. These are more Artistic responsibilities, which are directly opposite to your Conventional ways. One strategy to deal with this is to delegate the Artistic tasks and assume responsibility for making sure the tasks get done. You maintain the Administrative duties and get rid of the Artistic ones.
Part Three: Set Goals to Bring Your Interests and Responsibilities in line
Step vi: The best way of making sure that something gets done is to set a specific, time limited goal. Identify two or three of the most important problem areas, and set realistic goals to change things.
| Tip 2: |
For all those insecure people who dont wanna waste a penny on online tests, the following test is a simple personality test
http://www.outofservice.com/bigfive/
posted by malaika at 9:14 PM
